I don't know if it's the media hype getting to me, or the fact that people are only starting to read the novels because of the movie. But I feel somewhat disappointed. I'm not even sure why I feel this way, and I haven't even seen the movie yet. It starts playing in theaters today.
There are some mixed reviews that I have read in the papers so far. I don't know if it's false advertising or simply the hormonal craze to be seduced by a supernatural predator ravaging the minds of young, impressionable girls. Supposedly, the movie is good. However, it might as well depend on who you're asking. These "Twilighters," let's just call them for now (I'm one of them, but I'm not as carried away as most), might be more likely to tell you that the movie was awesome and that Edward Cullen is a sexy beast.
But according to Mina Hochberg, the movie critic in amNY, " 'Twilight' might be too anemic to hold your interest." It's kind of amusing how she calls Edward (played by Robert Pattinson) an intense, brooding fellow with a staring problem. Now that I think about it, he actually is. But can he help himself when he's so attracted to the sweetest thing he's ever encountered? She's like chocolate to him. As Hochberg puts it, "If you thought hormones made men act up, try blood-lust." HAHA. But that's besides my point.
Hochberg wrote that when it comes to the dialogue between the two forbidden lovebirds, "you can't tell if the awkwardness comes from teen angst or clumsy acting." She says, "The stilted script makes it difficult to relate to the characters... Even as a romance, the chemistry is tepid... It's not enough to make a compelling love story. Or an action story, for that matter."
That is precisely what I fear - the movie may not measure up to the high standards that I have developed for the plotlines and Meyer's storytelling style.
I don't know if it's just me, or if it's the way that the movie was advertised, or if something is lacking in the actors' enthusiasm (based on what I've seen in the trailers), but somehow I'm not as excited as I thought I would be.
Or perhaps I grew out of placing Edward Cullen on a pedestal. He's too perfect, even for a vampire. I mean, for crying out loud - Instead of turning her into an immortal, youthful-looking vampire, Edward wants Bella to live her life fully as a normal human being (which means that she would grow old... I honestly don't blame her for being upset on her birthday).
He's just too perfect, it's unnerving. And unrealistic... Maybe living vicariously through Bella Swan's experiences just aren't cutting it for me.
Perhaps I crave for something more, something real. Someone real. Someone... three-dimensional, soft-spoken, clever, funny, somewhat serious yet also laid-back, and humble. Someone who makes me feel comfortable in my own skin, just the way I am. His only superpower would be to make me swoon, causing my heart to melt with a single goofy, lop-sided smile. Someone who I don't fear, but who I would fear losing. So there's my ideal guy. Or not even an ideal... more like just an idea of what he would be or should be like.
Anyway, I might watch the film sometime within the upcoming week. I'll give it a chance just to see how it goes and how it compares to the book (which I still think will prove disappointing). But whatever, I guess. I'll toss my whims to the winds of chance and see what happens.
He's just too perfect, it's unnerving. And unrealistic... Maybe living vicariously through Bella Swan's experiences just aren't cutting it for me.
ReplyDeleteAmen to that one. These images spoon-fed to us since we were little girls are just setting us up for romantic disaster: no one will ever be nice enough, no one will ever be handsome enough, no one will ever be good enough.
The way I see it, the Twilight phenomenon is this decade's Disney fairytale(forgive me if this analogy is completely off; I have not read the books or watched the movie and am speaking solely on the romantic aspect). I watched Aladdin last Wednesday for the first time since I was five, and thought to myself "This is not the way people fall in love". These standards we grew up with are with us subconsciously and we apply them without knowing. Many times, we are the only ones who make ourselves unhappy because we expect too much.
There is nothing wrong with having standards with relationships; we should if we want to differentiate the scum from the gems. But these standards? That's like asking all women to look perfect, act perfect, be perfect 24/7. We come pretty damn close, but come on; It's impossible.
His only superpower would be to make me swoon, causing my heart to melt with a single goofy, lop-sided smile. <-- This, however, is perfectly reasonable.
I'm not sure if this post any sense. Lmao.
i haven't read the book yet, so i can't really say what i think (although i promised my friend i will read it over the thanksgiving break) but i have a feeling that many people will probably be let down by the movie...it's rare that any book-to-movie adaptation will ever match up to the way the story was written and the way that readers have pictured the scenes in their imaginations.
ReplyDeletei've been wary about reading this book because i am not a "romantic" person...i might be a fangirl but i've just never been one of those "i want a guy who will write me poems and songs and be the sweetest, most charming and handsome and caring person ever" because in my opinion, that's somewhat unrealistic. not that there aren't nice guys out there, but you know what i mean. i guess the thing with me is that i have a tendency to be attracted to "funny asshole" type of people...so the whole romantic thing is kind of lost on me.
but even if the movie doesn't match up to your expectations/isn't as good as the book, you can still appreciate the hotness of robert pattinson! (although i think he was hotter as cedric, personally) and if we all end up seeing it together, at least it was time spent with friends, right? idk haha...that was kind of a fail attempt at getting you to be optimistic, i think >.<